Hi,
If the agent AI used to produce the AI slop, would be named.
One could fork the repo. Do some change using the same AI.
And do a pull request. Maybe I am mistaken,
but on a first sight, it is not so evident, whether a) there is
attempt to hide that it is AI slop, or b) whether there is some
agent card included in the project, so that one could
continue where others left off. After all GitHub is based
on the idea of forking and sharing.
Bye
P.S.: I complete made that up that an agent card would
help. But I derived it from the A2A project. So this is
the speculative part of my post. Maybe there are other
solutions, to still have humans in the loop, in a more
meaningful way, in that the tools are also shared. In this
case adressing the agentic AI that made the AI slop.
Food for thought: Does your Agent have a Card?
https://discourse.prolog-lang.org/t/food-for-thought-does-your-agent-have-a-card/206
While the A2A project casts the agent card as a solution
to interoperability. Maybe its also key to group cooperation,
keeping the human in the loop and giving them strong
tools, and not use AI slop to build silly weak fortresses.